Lexical and Syntactical Competencies among English Major Students of the University of Bohol

Luzviminda Abdul

Abstract


The purpose of this study was to assess the competency level of the English major students of the University of Bohol (UB), in the aspects of lexicon and syntax. The study further sought to find the correlation between lexical and syntactical competencies and the degree of variance on the different dimensions in lexicon and in syntax. The study made use of the descriptive method of research. It also made use of complete enumeration of the junior respondents from both the Teachers College and the College of Arts and Sciences for the second semester of school year 2016-2017. The results showed that the Junior English major students of UB had high competency level in lexicon. They performed high in context clues, word formation, and structural analysis but performed moderately in idioms. On the other hand, the students had a Moderate competency level in Syntax. They performed the best in subject-verb agreement but performed the worst in sentence modification/transformation. There was a correlation between lexical and syntactical competency; students who got high in lexicon were also high in syntax. There was also variance in the lexical competencies on the four dimensions. The English major students’ competency in getting meaning through context clues, word formation and structural analysis and idioms were of varying extent. Students performed differently in all these aspects. Context clues got the highest, idioms got the lowest average competency. Subject-verb agreement obtained the highest average competency whereas sentence modification/ transformation obtained the least.

Keywords


Lexicon; syntax; lexical competency; syntactical competency; English grammar; English vocabulary; English major students

Full Text: PDF

References


Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1982). The construct validation of some components of communicative proficiency. TESOL quarterly, 16(4), 449-465. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/wLuSMz, (accessed last 16 January 2016).
Borlongan, A,M, (2009) A Survey on Language Use, Attitudes and Identity in Relation to Philippine English among Young Generation Filipinos: An Initial Sample from a Private University. Online Submission, 3,74-107. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/7F5Erz, (accessed last 16 December 2016).
Bowey, J. A. (1986). Syntactic awareness in relation to reading skill and ongoing reading comprehension monitoring. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 41(2), 282-299. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/Gy4fck, (accessed last 16 January 2016).
Celce-Murcia, M., Dörnyei, Z., & Thurrell, S. (1995). Communicative competence: A pedagogically motivated model with content specifications. Issues in Applied linguistics, 6(2), 5-35. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/oVSAhp, (accessed last 16 January 2016).
Chang, S. C. (2011). A contrastive study of grammar translation method and communicative approach in teaching English grammar. English Language Teaching, 4(2), 13. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/vmdRMb, (accessed last 16 January 2016).
Chan, A. Y. (2004). Syntactic transfer: Evidence from the interlanguage of Hong Kong Chinese ESL learners. Modern language journal, 56-74. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/hIWypq, (accessed last 16 January 2016).
Chomsky, N. (2014). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax (Vol. 11). MIT press. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/pbCvBe, (accessed last 16 January 2016).
Jenkins, J., & Leung, C. (2014). English as a lingua franca. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/zGBZPy, (accessed last 13 January 2016).
Krashen, S. D., & Terrell, T. D. (1983). The natural approach: Language acquisition in the classroom. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/23XaBZ (accessed last 13 January 2016).
Lauttamus, T., Nerbonne, J., &Wiersma, W. (2007). Detecting syntactic contamination in emigrants: the English of Finnish Australians. SKY Journal of Linguistics, 20, 273-307. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/zfrDL6 (accessed last 12 January 2016).
Luciana. (2006). Roles of Output in Foreign Language Learning: A Case of Collaborative Grammar Task. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 3(3), 143-176. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/mJqyr2 (accessed last 12 January 2016).
Schütz, R. (2007). Stephen Krashen's theory of second language acquisition. English made in Brazil, 2(2), 2007. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/BvD6nf, (accessed last 16 January 2016).
Terrell, T. D. (1986). Acquisition in the natural approach: The binding/access framework. The Modern Language Journal, 70(3), 213-227. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/uHN56W, (accessed last 15 January 2016).



DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15631/aubgsps.v12i1.89

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 ACADEME University of Bohol, Graduate School and Professional Studies

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.